Author Guidelines

Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.

  • Author(s) confirm  that the submission  has not been previously published and is not being concurrently submited elsewhere , specifically in other journal or publishers (except in the form abstract , a part of an academic thesis, or archived in the author's institutional repository or author's homapage-see depocit policy)
  • Author(s) confirm that (1) blinded  manuscript (including  main text, figure, table, reference) and (2) tittle page (including tittle, affiliation, correspondence (name and tittle, address, city, postal code, city and country), author detail, funding , acknowledgment, conflicting interest declaration, author contribution & use of AI in scientific writing declaration) are uploaded separately. 
  • Author(s) confirm that blinded manuscript and tittle page  are submitted in doc, or docx format (NOT PDF Format)
  • Author(s) confirm that the manuscript follow the correct layout: one colomn, Single space , A4 , Times New Roman, 10
  • Author(s) confirm that all files are in english lenguange
  • Author(s) have stated clearly the permission statement regarding the instruments used in their study. If the instruments are in the public domain, this should also be explicitly stated. If permission is not required, provide a clear explanation for this as well. Failure to provide this information may result in immediate rejection.
  • Author(s) confirm that a Trial Registry Number has been obtained and is mentioned on the Title Page or within the Main Text [for all experimental studies]. Failure to provide this information will result in immediate rejection
  • Author(s) confirm that they use a reporting guideline from EQUATOR Network or NLM’s Research Reporting Guidelines and Initiatives, such as CONSORT, TREND, COREQ, STROBE, PRISMA, etc. for their research/review article.
  • Author(s) acknowledge that making a double submission will result in being blacklisted.

Abstract (in document file)

Abstract consists of background, method, results and discussion, research conclusions, using Times new roman font, size 10, single space,  and included in the main text during the submission process and should not exceed 250 words in lenght.

Keywords: For generating keywords  for your abstract , we recomended  utilizing "MeSH on Demand" provided by US National Library of Medicine. Simply copy and paste your abstract into the tools , and it will suggest appropriate  keywords based on content. Select 3-5 that are most  relevant to your article. 

INTRODUCTION (TNR,10,BOLD) (in document file)
The introduction is written in Times New Roman, size 10, Double space and consists of the background of the research problem, originality, previous research, objectives and problem solutions.

METHOD (in document file)
The method consists of the type of research, research design, research location and time, data collection techniques, data presentation, Number of Ethics  and research instruments.

RESULT AND DISCUSSION (in document file)

A series of research results based on a logical sequence to form a story. The contents show facts/data and do not discuss the results. Can use Tables and Numbers but do not repeat the same data in pictures, tables and text. To further clarify the description, can use subtitles.

The discussion is a basic explanation, relationship and generalization indicated by the results. The description answers the research question. If there are doubtful results then display them objectively.

CONCLUSION (in document file)

In the conclusion there should be no references. The conclusion contains the facts obtained, it is sufficient to answer the problem or research objective (don't discuss it again); State possible applications, implications and speculations accordingly. If necessary, provide suggestions for further research. State the conclusion in sentences in the form of paragraphs, not in the form of numbering.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS (in tittle page)

Mention the names of the donors and facilitation providers who helped.

 

AUTHOR’S CONTRIBUTION STATEMENT ( in Tittle Page)

MR X: Conceptualization, Writing- Original Draft, Review & Editing. MRS Y:  Conceptualization,  Methodology,  Manuscript  review. MR XX: Supervision. MR K: Formal analysis, Writing -Original draft, Manuscript review. MR Y , MRS B: Validation, Manuscript review. 

CONFLICT OF INTEREST (in Tittle Page)

The authors declare no conflict of interest/or conflict 

 

DECLARATION OF GENERATIVE AI AND AI-ASSISTED TECHNOLOGIES IN THE WRITING PROCESS (in tittle page)

The authors acknowledge the use of ChatGPT, Scispace, Perplexity, Grammarly, and DeepL to support language improvement, improve clarity, and improve the overall readability and structure of the manuscript.

 

FUNDING (in tittle page)

No. Funding/or funding number :

Table  (in document file)

table should be self-contained and serve as complementary source  of information, avoiding redudancy with the text. please make your table in open table (No vertical line)

Figure  (in document file)

while author are encouraged  to submit figure of the highest quality , it is important to note  that a diverse range a format, sizes, and resolution are accepted  for the purpose a peer review.

REFERENCES (Bibliography at least 25, use Mendeley/ENDNOTE and Vancouver style) (in document file)
Bibliography TermsReference sources Must use reference applications such as Mendeley, Endnote, Zotero and so on.
Reference sources come from journals, books, official websites, conferences, scientific works.
Minimum 10 referral sources provided that 90% are from journals and 10% are from other references.
Reference sources at least the last 5 years if they come from journals and 10 years if from books


Here's an example:
Books and Monographs
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Australia's health 2004. Canberra: AIHW; 2004.
New B, Le Grand J. Rationalizing in the NHS. London: King's Fund; 1996.


Chapters published in books
Mickan SM, Boyce RA. Organizational change and adaptation in health care. In: Harris MG and Associates. Managing health services: concepts and practice. Sydney: Elsevier; 2006.


Journal articles
Amir H, Supporting and prohibiting factors in reflective case discussion (RCD). Nurs &Health 2022;7(1):1-5
Turrell G, Mathers C. Socioeconomic inequalities in all-cause and specific-cause mortality in Australia: 1985-1987 and 1995-.1997. Int J Epidemiol 2001; 30(2): 231-239. doi:10.1016/j.cden.2014.06.002.


References from the World Wide Web
Perneger TV, Hudelson PM. Writing a research article: advice to beginners. Int Journal for Quality in Health Care 2004; 191-192. Available: <http://intqhc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/16/3/191> (Accessed 1/03/06)

OR Visit Journal Template https://bit.ly/TemplateIdea2026